فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی

بررسی اثرات الکترونیکی ‌شدن بر عملکرد صادراتی شرکت‌های کوچک ‌و متوسط

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 فارغ التحصیل کارشناسی ارشد، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی پیشرفت، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
با توجه به‌کارگیری فناوری‌های الگترونیکی برای کسب مزیت رقابتی، صادرکنندگان کوچک‌ومتوسط ایرانی برای بهبود عملکرد صادراتی در بازارهای هدف نیازمند بهره‌برداری از فناوری‌های الکترونیکی هستند. بنابراین، هدف پژوهش بررسی اثرات مستقیم و غیرمستقیم الگترونیکی شدن بر عملکرد صادراتی شرکت‌های کوچک‌ومتوسط می‌باشد. پژوهش به روش پیمایشی انجام و از مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و ابزار پرسشنامه برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها و از روش معادلات ساختاری برای تایید مدل نظری استفاده شد. ابزار تحلیل، نرم افزار SPSS و SmartPLS بود. یافته‌های 70 شرکت صادراتی ‌نشان‌داد الکترونیکی‌شدن موجب تقویت آمادگی صادراتی شده و تقویت آمادگی صادراتی به افزایش عملکرد صادراتی می‎‌انجامد. همچنین الکترونیکی‌شدن بصورت مستقیم و غیرمستقیم بر عملکرد صادراتی اثر‌گذار بوده است، اما میزان اثرگذاری غیرمستقیم با میانجیگری نقش آمادگی صادراتی بیشتر بوده است. بطورکلی شرکت‌های صادراتی کوچک‌ومتوسط ایرانی برای افزایش عملکرد صادراتیشان در شرایط تحریم و چالش‌های موجود می‌توانند از ابزارهای الگترونیکی استفاده کنند. اما نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که اگر مدیران چهار بُعد زیرساخت‌های الکترونیکی، فرآیندهای کسب‌و‌کار، مدل تجارت الکترونیک (تبادلات محصول و تراکنش مالی) و نحوه‌ی بازاریابی الکترونیکی در بازارهای هدف صادراتی را با نگاه بر تقویت مولفه‌های آمادگی صادراتی، مورد بازمهندسی و بازطراحی قرار دهند، می‌توانند اثرات به مراتب بیشتری از الکترونیکی‌شدن را بر عملکرد صادراتی انتظار داشته باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the effects of digitalization on the export performance of SMEs

نویسندگان English

Ashkan Goldooz 1
Amir Zakery 2
Rahim Khanizad 3
1 MA graduated, Economics and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Economics and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Economics and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Despite the significant role of exports in the development of the country's economy and the increasing penetration of digital technologies in businesses, there are still many obstacles and challenges to the use of digital technologies, such as management challenges, lack of sufficient capacity to use new technologies, infrastructural barriers, and sanctions especially for Iranian firms and for SMEs, etc. Also, the smaller the scale of these companies, the higher the risk they will face. In another word, the competitive environment and political and economic problems become more complicated for exporting firms and young SMEs, and low-experienced ones. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct some local research in this field due to the relative lack of existing research. Therefore, the question arises whether the digitalization of companies, despite those limitations and challenges, has been able to affect export performance, and if the answer is yes, how this effect has been. Thus, our main goal is to investigate the direct and indirect effects of digitalization on export performance and evaluate the mediating role of export readiness among SMEs. Focusing on SMEs internationalization among the Iranian companies in this research is considered an innovative matter. Methodology
This research is considered as an applied one. To design the questionnaire, after library studies and a review of available documents, the interviewes have been done with several university academics and export experts. After applying their opinion, a questionnaire was designed as a data collection tool. Then the validity and reliability of this questionnaire were checked and approved. The statistical population of this research is all Iranian small and medium-sized companies that are active in the field of export and have experience using at least one of the e-commerce processes, including buying, selling, transferring, and exchanging goods or providing information through the Internet. Due to the lack of a specific database of export SMEs, 70 SMEs were specified as the statistical sample size according to the opinion of some academics. The sampling method in this research was non-random and the questionnaire was distributed among 70 available export companies. Respondents to the questionnaire were considered to be one representative of each company. Therefore, the measurement units in this research are companies. After collecting the data, the structural equation method was used to explain the theoretical model and analyze the research assumptions. SPSS 27 and SmartPLS 3 were used for analyzing data.
Results and Discussion
The results of collecting the responses of 70 export SMEs showed that the average value of main variables were upper than half (2.5<) and Digitalization was equal to 2.94, export readiness was equal to 3.16, and export performance was equal to 2.68. Additionally, the digitalization components were correlated with export readiness and export performance. Furthermore, all factor loadings were 95% significant. Then we find out that digitalization has direct and indirect effects on export performance. However, the amount of indirect effect through the mediation of the role of export readiness has been higher. It was also confirmed that digitalization strengthens export readiness and strengthening export readiness leads to increased export performance.
Conclusion
In the context of the direct impact of digitalization on export performance, the results showed that despite the challenges such as management challenges, enforced sanctions, and other export obstacles that companies especially small and medium-sized ones are faced, digitalization has been able to directly increase their export performance. Also, the effect of digitalization on export performance was confirmed indirectly. The findings of this research confirmed that digitalization in the four dimensions of digital infrastructure, e-commerce, electronic business processes, and digital marketing has been able to improve the export readiness of companies in the fields of management capability, employee competence, access to more financial resources, knowledge management and application of lessons learned and previous experiences in export, competitive advantage in international markets, level of technical knowledge and expertise, ability to analyze financial issues, international marketing performance (in the field of branding, advertising, negotiation, pricing, and distribution), logistics, and access to statistics and information. On the other hand, those companies that had higher export readiness showed higher export performance. Based on this, export readiness has been able to play a mediating role in the relationship between digitalization and export performance. However, regarding the comparison of the effectiveness of digitalization in two direct and indirect ways on export performance, the findings of the research indicate that this relationship was stronger indirectly and through the mediating role of export readiness. Since the effectiveness of digitalization on export performance is stronger through the indirect route and the mediating role of export readiness, managers should keep in mind that if planning for digitalization is done to strengthen each of the components related to export readiness, it can have a greater impact on the export their business perform. To localize and develop the current model, researchers can repeat the research separately for different industries and regions and check the effect of digitalization on export performance for each condition.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Digitalization
Export readiness
Internationalization
Performance
SME
  1. Aghazadeh, H., & Esfidani, M. (2016). Examining the level of e-commerce maturity of Iran's top exporters in 1382. Economic Research, 41(75), 75-109. (In Persian)
  2. Andersen, P. H. (2005). Export intermediation and the internet: An activity-unbundling approach [Article]. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330510593250
  3. Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2020). A framework to evaluate the effects of organizational resilience on service quality. Sustainability12(3), 958.
  4. Azizabadi, M. (2019). Investigating the impact of e-commerce on export development (case study: pharmaceutical industry in Mashhad). Accounting and Management Perspective, 3(29), 148-159. (In Persian)
  5. Azizi, A. D., Rahimi, F. A. & Mousavi, S. M. (2014). Examining export performance measurement indicators. Business reviews, 13(72), 43-59. (In Persian)
  6. Bianchini, M., & Kwon, I. (2021). Enhancing SMEs’ resilience through digitalisation: The case of Korea. OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, No. 27, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/23bd7a26-en.
  7.  Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, N. (2020). A network perspective of international entrepreneurship within small and medium-sized firms: A review and research agenda. METU Studies in Development, 47(2), 125-161.
  8. Cassetta, E., Monarca, U., Dileo, I., Di Berardino, C., & Pini, M. (2020). The relationship between digital technologies and internationalisation. Evidence from Italian SMEs. Industry and Innovation, 27(4), 311-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1696182
  1. Chang, H. H., & Chen Wang, (2008). The relationship between network structure and international channel performance: a moderating effect of E-business activity. The Service Industries Journal, 28(2), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060701843595
  1. Dehdashti Shahrokh, Z. (2016). Factors affecting the export performance of SMEs. Management studies (improvement and transformation), 18(53), 51-77. (In Persian)
  2. Denicolai, S., Zucchella, A. & Magnani, G. (2021). Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166(12), 120650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120650
  3. Dethine, B., Enjolras, M., & Monticolo, D. (2020). Digitalization and SMEs’ export management: Impacts on resources and capabilities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(4), 18-34. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1344.
  4. Eduardsen, J. (2018). Internationalisation Through Digitalisation: the Impact of E-Commerce Usage on Internationalisation in Small- and Medium-Sized Firms. International Business in the Information and Digital Age, 13, 159-186. http://doi.org/10.1108/S1745-886220180000013008
  5. Elia, S., Giuffrida, M., Mariani, M. M., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce. Journal of Business Research, 132, 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.010
  6. Eller, R., Alford, P., Kallmünzer, A., & Peters, M. (2020). Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization. Journal of Business Research, 112, 119-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.004
  7. Fatahi, M. A., Heydarzadeh, C., & Badiezadeh, A. (2019). Export challenges and opportunities of home businesses (handicrafts of Hamadan province). Scientific Journal of Business Strategies, 17(15), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.22070/cs.2020.3196. (In Persian)
  8. Fathi, S., & Azizi, Sh. (2016). Investigating the impact of e-business on export development: identifying the priorities of the industry sector in the country. Quarterly Journal of Business Research, 12(45), 179-220. (In Persian)
  9. Definition of Digitalization - Gartner Information Technology Glossary. (n.d.). Definition of Digitalization - Gartner Information Technology Glossary. Retrieved July 22, 2023, from: https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/digitalization
  10. Gerschewski, S., Scott-Kennel, J., & Rose, E. L. (2020). Ready to export? The role of export readiness for superior export performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. The World Economy, 43(5), 1253-1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/TWEC.12928
  11. Ghayor Baghbani, S. M., & Gholami, S. (2022). The effect of strategic alignment of integrationism on performance with organizational alignment. Strategic Management Studies Journal, 13(52), 173-191. doi: 10.22034/smsj.2022.163799. (In Persian)
  12. Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1988). The Role of Human Resources Strategy in Export Performance: A Longitudinal Study. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 493-505.
  13. Hinson, R., & Sorensen, O. (2006). E‐business and small Ghanaian exporters. Online Information Review, 30(2), 116-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610659166
  14. Jean, R.-J. B., & Kim, D. (2020). Internet and SMEs' internationalization: The role of platform and website. Journal of International Management, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTMAN.2019.100690
  15. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.E. (1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm - A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/PALGRAVE.JIBS.8490676
  16. Johanson, J., Mattsson, LG. (2015). Internationalisation in Industrial Systems — A Network Approach. In: Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. (eds) Knowledge, Networks and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508829_5
  17. Karimi Alawijeh, M. R., & Tak, P. (2018). Analysis of the level of export readiness of SMEs in Kermanshah province. Business Management Perspective, 72(18), 83-100. (In Persian)
  18. Lal, K. (2004). E-Business and Export Behavior: Evidence from Indian Firms. World Development, 32(3), 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2003.10.004
  19. Lee, Y. Y., Falahat, M., & Sia, B. K. (2020). Drivers of digital adoption: a multiple case analysis among low and high-tech industries in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2019-0093
  20. McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. (2003). Some fundamental issues in international entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 1-27.
  21. Morgan, R., & Katsikeas, C. (1997). Theories of international trade, foreign direct investment and firm internationalization: A critique. Management Decision, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749710160214
  22. Nazari, M., Vedadhir, A., Ezzati, H., & Turkman, A. (2022). Investigating the transformation process and digital strategy of the country's insurance industry. Strategic Management Studies Journal, 13(52), 158-141. https://doi.org/10.22034/smsj.2022.163802. (In Persian)
  23. OECD Digital for SMEs Global Initiative - Concept Note. (2021). In OECD (Ed.).
  24. OECD. (2021). The Digital Transformation of SMEs.
  25. Pakparvar, M., Meymand, M. M., & Hosseini, M. H. (2019). Smart digital marketing model for the development of Iran's high technology exports in Central Asia and the Caucasus region. Scientific Quarterly of Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, 26(110), 39-76. (In Persian)
  26. Prieto Remón, T. (2021). Impact of international organizations digitalization programs on air transport sustainability: The IATA case [Doctoral, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid]. From: https://oa.upm.es/68447/
  27. Rezazad, M., & Karim Khanzand, S. (2020). How digitalization affects the performance of the insurance industry, the 28th Insurance and Development Conference. (In Persian)
  28. Rezvani, M., & Mousavinejad, M. (2017). International entrepreneurship. Tehran, University of Tehran Press (UTP). (In Persian)
  29. Sharifi, M., Sanayei, A., & Ansari, A. (2022). The effect of customer knowledge management on organizational value creation in B2C e-commerce. Business Management, 14(2), 254-275.
  30. Tolstoy, D., Nordman, E. R., Hånell, S. M., & Özbek, N. (2021). The development of international e-commerce in retail SMEs: An effectuation perspective. Journal of World Business, 56(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JWB.2020.101165
  31. Traşca, D. L., Ştefan, G. M., Sahlian, D. N., Hoinaru, R., & Şerban-Oprescu, G. L. (2019). Digitalization and business activity The struggle to Catch Up in CEE countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(8), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11082204
  32. Vahabzadeh, Sh., & Ardhali, M. (2017). Investigating the effect of internet marketing on the growth of the export market in Iran (case study: dry goods exporters). Farda Management, 56(17), 83-96. (In Persian)
  33. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.09.022
  34. Wei, Q. (2012). E-commerce and export behavior: Evidence from Jiangxi firms. International Conference on Management Science and Engineering - Annual Conference Proceedings.
  35. Zamani, H., Noami, A., & Hamdi, K. (2022). Designing a content marketing model to increase purchase intention in digital marketing. Business Management, 14(2), 354-376. (In Persian)

 

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 اسفند 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 07 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 09 مرداد 1402